Legal Opinion
State v. Zatkovich
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 16, 2002No. 27237-7-IIPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
52 P.3d 36 (2002)
113 Wash.App. 70
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Michael John ZATKOVICH, Appellant.
No. 27237-7-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
August 16, 2002.
Pattie Mhoon, Tacoma, (Court Appointed), for Appellant.
Michelle Luna-Green, Pierce Co. Deputy Pros. Atty., Tacoma, for Respondent.
HUNT, C.J.
Michael Zatkovich appeals his exceptional sentence for stalking, which he claims is excessive, factually unsupported, and in conflict with the "real facts" doctrine. He argues further that his trial counsel was ineffective. Finding no error, we affirm.
FACTS
On May 8, 2000, the State…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Matter of Personal Restraint of RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. RitchieWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. NewtonWashington Supreme Court · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. BrundageCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.