Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 29, 1978No. 54723PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DALLY, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for passing a forged check; the punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions, is imprisonment for life.

Appellant contends that there is a fatal variance between the check set out in the indictment according to its tenor and alleged to be a forgery and the check introduced into evidence by the State. The check which appears in the indictment bears the date “2/19/74” and the bank transit number “88-135.” The check which was introduced into evidence bears the date “12/19/74” and the bank transit number “88-1135.”

Where the instrument…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
  2. Payne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Hurd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Strong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Doty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. McKellar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Chambers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Sauls v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. McKellar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API