Armstrong v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DALLY, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for passing a forged check; the punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions, is imprisonment for life.
Appellant contends that there is a fatal variance between the check set out in the indictment according to its tenor and alleged to be a forgery and the check introduced into evidence by the State. The check which appears in the indictment bears the date “2/19/74” and the bank transit number “88-135.” The check which was introduced into evidence bears the date “12/19/74” and the bank transit number “88-1135.”
Where the instrument…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Payne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Hurd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Strong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Doty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- McKellar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Chambers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Sauls v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- McKellar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.