Legal Opinion

Barton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 7, 1962No. 34965PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is forgery; the punishment, two years.

At the outset, we observe that there were at least three material variances between the indictment and the purportedly forged instrument which was introduced in evidence. The trial court overruled the objection to the introduction of the instrument and later declined to withdraw it from the jury’s consideration. In this he fell into error. Recently, in Williams v. State, 164 Texas Cr. Rep. 545, 301 S.W. 2d 107, we said:

“Where the instrument alleged to be forged is set out in the indictment according to its tenor the writing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. Bacon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. Patterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Hayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Warren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Kwallek v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Ramos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API