Legal Opinion
United States v. Thomas Anthony Ceraso, in No. 72-1279 Appeal of Beverly Ceraso, in 72-1280. Appeal of John E. Troutman, in 72-1284
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 16, 1972No. 72-1279, 72-1280 and 72-1284PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MAX ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Thomas Anthony Ceraso, Beverly Ceraso and John E. Troutman were tried to a jury and convicted under a two-count indictment charging them with conducting a book-making operation in the Williamsport, Pennsylvania, area in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1955 1 and with conspiring for that purpose as prohibited by 18 U.S.C. § 1371. 2 All three appellants submitted motions for a new trial, and the Cerasos also filed a motion for acquittal. The district court denied the requests, and we affirm.
The Cerasos and Troutman have filed separate briefs on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Perez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Richard Becker and Jack EisenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Michael A. Riehl, Appeal of Arthur J. Rinaldi. Appeal of James L. ChickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Maneer LeonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Leonard L. Cappetto, Individually and Doing Business as Western AvenuebilliardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- United States v. SmaldoneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. ZemekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.