Phoenix Children's Hospital, Inc. v. Grant
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRVINE, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 In Duquette v. Superior Court, 161 Ariz. 269, 778 P.2d 634 (App.1989), this Court held that defense counsel in a medical malpractice action may not engage in ex parte communications with a plaintiffs treating physicians without the plaintiffs consent. This special action asks us to decide if the ruling in Duquette bars communications between a defendant hospital and its counsel, and the hospital’s own employees who provided treatment to the plaintiff. We hold that it does not. Therefore, we accept jurisdiction and grant relief.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fridena v. EvansArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Samaritan Foundation v. GoodfarbArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Bain v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR MARICOPA CTY.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Lewin v. JacksonArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Youngs v. PeaceHealthWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Cheryl Hall v. James H. Crenshaw, M.D., The Jackson Clinic Professional AssociationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
- State v. ZeitnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- PHOENIX CHILDREN'S HOSP., INC. v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Youngs v. PeaceHealthWashington Supreme Court · 2014