Youngs v. PeaceHealth
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon McCloud, J.
¶ 1 The question presented in this case is whether Loudon v. Mhyre, 110 Wn.2d 675, 677, 756 P.2d 138 (1988), which prohibits defense counsel in a personal injury case from communicating ex parte with the plaintiff’s nonparty treating physician, applies to such physicians when they are employed by a defendant. Specifically, we are asked whether Loudon bars ex parte communications between a physician and his or her employer’s attorney where the employer is a corporation and named defendant whose corporate attorney-client privilege likely extends to the physician, at least as to certain…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Jicarilla Apache NationSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Petrillo v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Newman v. Highland School District No. 203Washington Supreme Court · 2016
- Magney v. PhamWashington Supreme Court · 2020
- Hermanson v. Multicare Health Sys., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2020
- Doug Hermanson, Res/cross-app v. Multi-care Health System, App/cross-respCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Newman v. Highland Sch. Dist. No. 203Washington Supreme Court · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.