Legal Opinion

Youngs v. PeaceHealth

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 2014No. 87811-1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon McCloud, J.

¶ 1 The question presented in this case is whether Loudon v. Mhyre, 110 Wn.2d 675, 677, 756 P.2d 138 (1988), which prohibits defense counsel in a personal injury case from communicating ex parte with the plaintiff’s nonparty treating physician, applies to such physicians when they are employed by a defendant. Specifically, we are asked whether Loudon bars ex parte communications between a physician and his or her employer’s attorney where the employer is a corporation and named defendant whose corporate attorney-client privilege likely extends to the physician, at least as to certain…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Jicarilla Apache NationSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Petrillo v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Newman v. Highland School District No. 203Washington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Magney v. PhamWashington Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Hermanson v. Multicare Health Sys., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Doug Hermanson, Res/cross-app v. Multi-care Health System, App/cross-respCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. Newman v. Highland Sch. Dist. No. 203Washington Supreme Court · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API