Eckhoff v. Forest Preserve District
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
Appellants filed suit in the circuit court of Cook county alleging that they are damaged by what they characterize as appellee the Forest Preserve District’s continuous, wrongful, needless and vexatious delay in the exercise of the power of eminent domain concerning their property. The second amended complaint alleged the ownership of about 80 acres of land, declared the best use was for residential subdivision purposes, and set out the acts of the Forest Preserve District, which they claim are the basis of their suit.
Appellee, hereinafter also referred to as the district, filed a motion to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Norris v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
- Simpson v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Winkelman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Schreiber v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Poole v. City of KankakeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
- Hamer v. State Highway Commission of the MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- City of Houston v. BiggersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Kane v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
- Lamar Whiteco Outdoor Corp. v. City of West ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.