Legal Opinion
United States v. Pimental
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 20, 2001No. CR. 99-10310-NGPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: RECONSIDERATION OF DISCOVERY RULINGS
GERTNER, District Judge.
Defendants Arthur L. Pimental and Loretta R. Pimental (“the Pimentals”) are charged with one count of conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and fourteen counts of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. The Pimentals have moved for dismissal of the indictment on various grounds. I held a hearing on the motion to dismiss on September 7, 2000. At the conclusion of the hearing, I took the motion under advisement pending the resolution of the Pimentals’ related motion for discovery, which was then…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Humana Inc. v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. PimentalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- In Re Grand Jury ProceedingsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- United States v. MazzolaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- United States v. PimentalDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- United States v. PimentalDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002