Legal Opinion

Augenblick v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 22, 1975No. 357-64PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge

Our decision in 180 Ct. Cl. 131, 377 F. 2d 586 (1967), invalidating plaintiff’s court-martial conviction and dismissal from the Navy, was reversed by the Supreme Court, 393 U.S. 348 (January 14, 1969). On the coming down of that Court’s mandate, plaintiff immediately filed here a motion for leave to file a first amended petition. Believing that this proposed amendment raised issues, which, if open to judicial scrutiny *77should have been presented earlier, or merely stated or restated positions which had been rejected by the high court or were required by its decision to be refused, we denied…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Cole v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. MilumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. State v. VessichioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. State v. GonzalesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. State v. SimsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API