Legal Opinion
Smeesters v. New Denmark Mutual Home Fire Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided April 11, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.
The insurance policy contains this provision:
“The interest of the insured in this policy is not assignable except with the consent of the company manifested in writing indorsed hereon or attached hereto and in case of any attempted transfer of this policy or a termination of the interest of the insured therein or in the property insured herein, either by sale or otherwise, without such written consent this policy shall thenceforth be void and of no effect.”
Also the following provision:
“In case any person or persons insured in this company shall sell, convey, or assign such insured property…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Keith v. Royal Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by6 opinions
- North River Insurance v. BelcherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
- L. Terry v. American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Macomber v. Minneapolis Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- New Hampshire Fire Ins. v. BolerWyoming Supreme Court · 1940
- Kitch v. Northwestern National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.