Legal Opinion

Macomber v. Minneapolis Fire & Marine Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownhart, J.

The trial court directed judgment in favor of the defendants on the theory that a contract of insurance is personal between the parties, and that the insurance companies, defendants, never entered into any contract of insurance with the plaintiff. The plaintiff, on the other hand, contends that he was the equitable owner of the premises and as such was entitled to insure the same, and that the insurance policy issued on the premises was for his benefit.

The policy contains a provision' of forfeiture if the title to' the property shall be other than “unconditional and sole ownership.” This…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dowling v. Lancashire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Welch v. Fire Ass'n of PhiladelphiaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Oshkosh Gas Light Co. v. Germania Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Bourgeois v. Northwestern National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Matthews v. Capital Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Linenschmidt v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  2. McKee Ex Rel. Burton v. Travelers Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Spohn v. National Fire Insurance Co. of HartfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Madgett v. Monroe County Mutual Tornado InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API