Legal Opinion
Berkovich v. Mostovaya
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided February 10, 2009PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*92OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order modified by providing that the branches of the motion by plaintiff seeking summary judgment on his cause of action and the dismissal of defendants’ counterclaim for the recovery of excess rents paid are denied; as so modified, affirmed without costs.
Plaintiff is a proprietary leaseholder of an apartment which, according to plaintiffs proprietary lease and stock certificate, is subject to the provisions of article II of the Private Housing Finance Law (the Mitchell-Lama Law) and section 58 of the Public Housing Law. Defendants were his long-term subtenants.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kelly v. KosugaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Lloyd Capital Corp. v. Pat Henchar, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Estro Chemical Co. v. FalkNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- In the Matter of Schorr v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation and DevelopmentNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rochdale Vil., Inc. v. Hallerdin-Grant, Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Queens County2024
- Rochdale Vil., Inc. v. Hallerdin-Grant, Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Queens County2024
- Schatz v. Cellco PartnershipDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Rochdale Vil., Inc. v. Hallerdin-Grant, Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Queens County2024