Legal Opinion
In the Matter of Schorr v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 13, 2008PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the petition dismissed.
In 1987, petitioner, his parents and brother moved into a two-bedroom Mitchell-Lama apartment in Manhattan. 1 Because petitioner was 14 years old at the time, he was the only member of his family not listed as a tenant of record. Petitioner left the apartment for college at some point in the early 1990s and there is no record of his return to the apartment until 1999, when his name first appeared on the apartment’s annual income report. By February 2000, the tenants of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parkview Associates v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- E.F.S. Ventures Corp. v. FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- New York State Medical Transporters Ass'n v. PeralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- KSLM-Columbus Apartments, Inc. v. New York State Division of HousingNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Columbus Park Corp. v. Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Murphy v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Rosello v. RheaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Ortiz v. RheaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- West Midtown Mgt. Group, Inc. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.