Legal Opinion
Novo Nordisk, Inc. v. Paddock Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 22, 2011No. Civil 10-2199 (DWF/JJK)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on a Motion to Stay Litigation of Patent Claims and Defenses Pending Appeal brought by Plaintiffs Novo Nordisk Inc. and Novo Nordisk A/S (together, “Novo Nordisk”) and a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Based on Collateral Estoppel and/or Summary Judgment of No Infringement brought by Defendant Paddock Laboratories, Inc. (“Paddock”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in part and denies in part Paddock’s motion and denies Novo Nordisk’s motion.
BACKGROUND
Novo Nordisk…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Galderma Laboratories Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2012