Legal Opinion
Galderma Laboratories Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 7, 2012No. C.A. No. 11-1106-LPSPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
LEONARD P. STARK, District Judge.
At Wilmington this 7th day of September, 2012:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for partial judgment on the pleadings based on collateral estoppel (D.I. 52) (hereinafter, “Motion” or “Mot.”) is GRANTED for the following reasons:
In this Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) patent litigation, Defendants, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC and Amneal Pharmaceuticals Co. (I) Pvt. Ltd. (collectively, “Amneal”), move for judgment on the pleadings that their proposed 40 mg doxycycline product does not infringe the “Ashley patents.” 1 Amneal’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jeffrey J. Sikirica, Esq., as Trustee of Pittsburgh Beauty Academy, Inc. v. Nationwide Insurance Company Jeffrey J. SikiricaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Rosenau v. Unifund Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Jean Alexander Cosmetics, Inc. v. L'OreaL Usa, Inc. Redkin 5th Avenue, N.Y.CCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Galderma Labs., L.P. v. Amneal Pharm., LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2018
- United Access Technologies, LLC v. CenturyTel Broadband Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- Hrycak v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- International Business Machines Corporation v. Rakuten, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2022