Legal Opinion
Virginia Office for Protection & Advocacy v. Stewart
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 19, 2011No. 09-529PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
*683OPINION OF THE COURT
[563 U.S. 250]
2Opinion of the Court · ScaliaJustice Scalia
We consider whether Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, 28 S. Ct. 441, 52 L. Ed. 714 (1908), allows a federal court to hear a lawsuit for prospective relief against state officials brought by another agency of the same State.
I
A
The Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (DD Act), 114 Stat. 1677, 42 U.S.C. § 15001 et seq., offers States federal money to improve community services, such as medical care and job training, for individuals with developmental disabilities. See §§ 15023(a), 15024. As a condition of that funding, a State must…
3Cases cited21 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by44 opinions
- California v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Albany Law School v. New York State Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental DisabilitiesNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- McDonough Associates, Incorpor v. Ann SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Planned Parenthood KS & Mid-MO v. BrownbackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Amundson Ex Rel. Amundson v. Wisconsin Department of Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.