Legal Opinion
Indiana Protection & Advocacy Services v. Indiana Family & Social Services Administration
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 22, 2010No. 08-3183PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.
Pursuant to the federal Protection and Advocacy for Individuals with Mental Illness Act of 1986 (“the PAIMI Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 10801 et seq., the district court ordered Indiana state officials and a state agency to give plaintiff Indiana Protection and Advocacy Services (“IPAS”) access to records of two mentally ill patients in a state hospital. On appeal, a panel of this court reversed, finding that the Eleventh Amendment and the lack of a statutory cause of action barred the action. Indiana Protection and Advocacy Services v. Indiana Family and Social Services…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of Indiana, Inc. v. Commissioner of Indiana State Department of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Chessie Logistics Company, LLC v. Krinos Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Phoenix International Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- McDonough Associates, Incorpor v. Ann SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Michigan Corrections Organization v. Michigan Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.