Legal Opinion
Cisko v. Diocese of Steubenville
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 4, 2013No. 3D12-1496PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSuarez, J.
John Cisko, as personal representative of the Estate of Frederick Anthony Cisko, and John Doe appeal the entry of final summary judgment based on the determination that the statute of limitations bars their negligence claim against the Diocese of Steubenville. We affirm.
In May 2009, the appellants sued the Diocese for negligence related to physical and sexual abuse they allegedly suffered between 1966 and 1967 by two priests under the Diocese’s supervision. The complaint alleges the events produced traumatic amnesia that blocked their memory of the abuse until May 2005. The Diocese moved for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hearndon v. GrahamSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Davis v. MonahanSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Doe ex rel. Doe's Mother v. SinrodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
3Cited by7 opinions
- Estate of Yevgenyi Scherban v. Suntrust BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Doe v. St. John's Episcopal Parish Day School, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2014
- Doe No. 3 v. Nur-Ul-Islam Academy, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- American Home Assurance Co. v. Weaver Aggregate Transport, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2013
- Broz v. ReeceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.