Doe No. 3 v. Nur-Ul-Islam Academy, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtConner, J.
Jane Doe No. 3 (“Doe”)1 appeals the final judgment dismissing her complaint with prejudice, asserting the trial court erred in finding her claims barred by the statute of limitations. Because we agree with Doe’s argument that the defense is not apparent from the four corners of her complaint, we reverse the dismissal with prejudice.
Pertinent Facts and Trial Proceedings Doe initially filed her complaint against Nur-Ul-Islam of South Florida, Inc. (“the Mosque”), Nur-Ul-Islam Academy, Inc. and Kem Hussain (collectively, “the Academy”) in November 2014.2 Therein, she alleged that the Mosque…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Malicki v. DoeSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Hearndon v. GrahamSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Berger v. JacksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
- MEBA Medical & Benefits Plan v. LagoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Frank v. Campbell Property Management, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- D.H. v. Adept Community Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2018
- R.R. v. New LifeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- D.H. v. Adept Community Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2018
- D.H. v. Adept Community Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2018
- GABRIJI, LLC v. HOLLYWOOD EAST, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.