Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 5, 2016No. 110061PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnson, J.:

Shelbert Smith appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to file a direct appeal out of time. He argues that he should be allowed an untimely appeal because his appointed trial counsel failed to file tire appeal that Smith requested. Because this case is presented to us without adequate factual findings, we remand to the district court to make tire requisite findings pursuant to the framework described in this opinion.

Factual and Procedural Overview

Smith was convicted as an adult in 1993, after pleading nolo contendere to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  4. Arthur Lee Norris v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. Donna Barger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  3. Ponds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019
  4. State v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  5. State v. McCroyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API