Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 17, 2020No. 119359PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 119,359 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. BILLY J. HILL, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. An appellate court generally reviews the denial of a postsentence motion to withdraw a plea for an abuse of discretion. 2. The one-year statute of limitations for moving to withdraw a plea in K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 22-3210(e)(1) begins to run for preexisting claims on the date the amended statute became effective, April 16, 2009. A motion filed after the statute of limitations has expired may be granted only if the movant establishes excusable neglect. 3. Pro se…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  2. State v. EdgarSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  4. State v. MosesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  5. State v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. LingenfelterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  2. State v. TomlinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  3. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2023
  4. Waliallah v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API