Olson v. First Church of Nazarene
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONEBURNER, Judge.
The Minnesota District Church of the Nazarene (the District) appeals the district court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment. The District argues that because the claims of respondents Lisa and Jay Olson arise from the context of pastoral counseling, the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and art. I, § 16 of the Minnesota Constitution prohibit the court from exercising jurisdiction over Olsons’ claims. We affirm the district court’s denial of summary judgment for the claims of negligent supervision, negligent retention, and vicarious liability,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. MilivojevichSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jones v. WolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Melina v. ChaplinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Roman Catholic Diocese of Jackson v. MorrisonMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
- Connor v. Archdiocese of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Doe YZ v. Shattuck-St. Mary's SchoolDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- C.B. ex rel. L.B. v. Evangelical Lutheran Church in AmericaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Shagalow v. State, Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.