Legal Opinion

Olson v. First Church of Nazarene

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 20, 2003No. C8-02-1941PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge.

The Minnesota District Church of the Nazarene (the District) appeals the district court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment. The District argues that because the claims of respondents Lisa and Jay Olson arise from the context of pastoral counseling, the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and art. I, § 16 of the Minnesota Constitution prohibit the court from exercising jurisdiction over Olsons’ claims. We affirm the district court’s denial of summary judgment for the claims of negligent supervision, negligent retention, and vicarious liability,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. MilivojevichSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Jones v. WolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Melina v. ChaplinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Roman Catholic Diocese of Jackson v. MorrisonMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Connor v. Archdiocese of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Doe YZ v. Shattuck-St. Mary's SchoolDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
  4. C.B. ex rel. L.B. v. Evangelical Lutheran Church in AmericaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  5. Shagalow v. State, Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API