Legal Opinion

Shagalow v. State, Department of Human Services

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 2006No. A06-246PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

Appellant challenges the decision of respondent Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) denying Medical Assistance coverage for habilitation services in Jerusalem, Israel. Appellant claims that there is no habilitation services program appropriate for her condition and compatible with her religious beliefs in Minnesota; that the only residential habili-tation program providing suitable services consistent with her beliefs is in Jerusalem, Israel; that rules governing the Medical Assistance program do not preclude payment for these services in Israel; and that denial…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Olmstead v. L.C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edina Community Lutheran Church v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  2. Stinemetz v. Kansas Health Policy AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  3. Young v. JessonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  4. In re the Matter of: Verdell Fredrick Borth v. Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Human Services, Carver CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API