Harvest Institute Freedman Federation v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
HODGES, Judge.
Plaintiffs seek declaratory and monetary relief for an alleged breach of post-Civil War treaties between the United States and the Five Civilized Tribes.1 Defendant argues that plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the statute of limitations, and that plaintiffs have not pointed to a government obligation that would entitle them to money damages. Plaintiffs contend that the statute of limitations does not apply because of the continuing claims doctrine.
Plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the six-year statute of limitations. The treaties in question do not provide a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Choctaw Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Westlands Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Parkwood Associates Ltd. Partnership v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Richard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Allen v. Chickasaw Indian Nation, TheDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2019
- SMITH v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026