Legal Opinion

Shipe v. Public Wholesale Water Supply District No. 25

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 26, 2009No. 100,556PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

This appeal raises two questions. First, do landowners who do not hold rights to the water appurtenant to their land have standing to enjoin a water district that is seeking a temporary easement to drill test wells on the landowners’ property? Second, when only a temporary easement is being sought, has the landowner presented a ripe case or controversy regarding the question of whether a water district can condemn water rights or, alternatively, property for the purpose of providing permanent access to a point of diversion for the use of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the InteriorSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. State Ex Rel. Morrison v. SebeliusSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  4. Hawley v. Kansas Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. BrembySupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Miami County Board of Commissioners v. Kanza Rail-Trails Conservancy, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  3. Sierra Club v. MoserSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. Padron v. LopezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. Solomon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API