Craddock v. the Flood Co., 23882 (1-16-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
This cause was heard upon the record in the trial court. Each error assigned has been reviewed and the following disposition is made:
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-Appellant, James Craddock, appeals the order of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas that granted summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee, The Flood Company ("Flood"), on his employment claims. We affirm.
{¶ 2} On January 14, 2005, Mr. Craddock was informed that his eleven-year employment with Flood would end effective February 4, 2005. Flood cited economic reasons for the decision to eliminate his position. Mr.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Vahila v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Jones v. Wheelersburg Local School Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Dunn v. GOJO IndustriesOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Bauer v. BrunswickOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Meminger v. Ohio State Univ.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Messer v. Summa Health Sys.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.