Legal Opinion
In the Interest of D.M.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided August 15, 2007No. 10-06-00407-CVPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Rhonda Moncrief brings this appeal from a decree terminating her parental rights. The judgment is affirmed. See Lozano v. Lozano, 52 S.W.3d 141, 143-44 (Tex.2001) (per curiam); see also Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 239-40, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 2727, 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (1972) (per curiam); Gilles v. Ware, 615 A.2d 533, 534 (D.C.1992) (per curiam).
Chief Justice GRAY concurs.
Justice REYNA concurs.
Justice VANCE dissents.
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lozano v. LozanoTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Gilles v. WareDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
4Cited by25 opinions
- in the Interest of D.W., T.W., and S.G., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
- In the Interest of S.T.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- In Re DWCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- In the Interest of D.J.R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2010
- in the Interest of S.T., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.