Legal Opinion
Barr v. International Mercantile Marine Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 12, 1928No. 35PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
This libel was filed by the assignee of the Fruit & Produce Exchange of Great Britain, Limited, the shipper and consignee, to recover loss due to decay of pears shipped in good order and condition upon appellee’s steamship New York, carried on the voyage from New York to-Southhampton. The pears were practically a total loss, and this was due to the failure-of the refrigerating plant to keep proper temperature in the storeroom. The cause of the-high temperature was due to the breaking of the port compressor rod neck bush, and this was caused by the excess of moisture in?…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The GermanicSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Knott v. Botany MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- The EdithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Andean Trading Co. v. Pacific Steam Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- The GermanicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Heinrich C. Horn, of the M/s Heinz Horn v. Cia De Navegacion Fruco, S.A. And J. R. Atkins, D/B/A Alabama Fruit and Produce Companu, Cia De Navegacion Fruco, S.A. And J. R. Atkins, D/B/A Albama Fruit and Produce Company v. Heinrich C. Horn, of the M/s Heinz HornCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Horn v. Cia de Navegacion FrucoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Grace Line, Inc. v. Todd Shipyards Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Philippine Sugar Centrals Agency v. Kokusai Kisen Kabushiki KaishaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- The S. S. AsturiasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.