Legal Opinion
The Edith
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 1, 1926No. 174, 175PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The treatment below of the uneontradieted facts presented seems to justify some restatement of legal principles relating to carriage of goods by sea.
The Harter Act (27 Stat. 445 [Comp. St. §§ 8029-8035]) was not retroactive, yet did announce the public policy of this country. The Energia, 66 F. 604, 13 C. C. A. 653. The events giving rise to The Edwin I. Morrison, 153 U. S. 199, 14 S. Ct. 823, 38 L. Ed. 688, and The Caledonia, 157 U. S. 124, 15 S. Ct. 537, 39 L. Ed, 644, arose before the act, but the causes were argued after it became law; wherefore it is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The SilviaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- The CaledoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- The Edwin I. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- The Carib PrinceSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- The RosaliaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Waterman S. S. Corp. v. United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- J. Gerber & Co. v. S.S. Sabine HowaldtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Sabine Towing Co. v. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Warner Sugar Refining Co. v. Munson S. S. LineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1927
- The Monarch of NassauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.