Legal Opinion

Fenske v. Service Employees International, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 26, 2016No. 14-71512PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOONAN, Circuit Judge:

James Fenske petitions for review of a decision of the Benefits Review Board of the Department of Labor (the “Board”) holding that Fenske could not receive concurrent payments for total disability and permanent partial disability under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (the “Act”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-50. While we generally disallow concurrent awards, Fenske seeks relief under our holding in Stevedoring Servs. of Am. v. Price, 382 F.3d 878 (9th Cir. 2004) (as *980amended) (“Price”), which allows concurrent awards for certain time-delayed injuries. We…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Memphis Community School District v. StachuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Bath Iron Works Corp. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Price v. Stevedoring Services of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Xavier Hernandez v. National Steel & ShipbuildingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API