Legal Opinion

Bath Iron Works Corp. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 12, 1993No. 91-871PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

Respondent Ernest C. Brown, a former employee of petitioner Bath Iron Works Corp., learned after he retired that he suffered from a work-related hearing loss. The parties agree that under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (LHWCA or Act), 44 Stat. 1424, as amended, 33 U. S. C. § 901 et seq., respondent is entitled to disability benefits on account of his injury. They disagree, however, as to the proper method of calculating those benefits.

There are essentially three “systems” 1 for compensating partially disabled workers under the Act, two of which are at issue in this case.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, and Garland R. HessCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Tello v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Metropolitan Stevedore Co. v. RamboSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Price v. Stevedoring Services of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Marbley v. BaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Marbley v. BaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API