Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1930No. Docket No. L.A. 11800PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

This appeal involves the validity of a street assessment in proceedings taken under the Street Opening Act of 1903, supplemented by the Street Opening Bond Act of 1922 (Deering’s General Laws 1923, Acts 8198 and 8199, p. 3309 et seq.), known as the "Third Street project,” in the City of Los Angeles, California. The case is a companion case to Allen v. City of Los Angeles (L. A. No. 11866), ante, p. 235 [291 Pac. 393]. The facts are the same, with the exception that appellant Johnson neither protested the district, the improvement nor the assessment. The cases are presented on the same record…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. BerginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Belser v. HoffschneiderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Allen v. Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Creed v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Peter R. Gadd, Inc. v. WorkmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hannon v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Byson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Raisch v. Sanitary Dist. No. 1 of Marin CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Allen v. Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Brissel v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API