Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Palmer

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 30, 2010No. Misc. Docket AG No. 49, September Term, 2009Published

1ConcurrenceBattaglia, J.

I concur with the result reached in the Majority opinion in this case and the resulting sanction, because Palmer’s self-reporting of his misconduct to Bar Counsel occurred only after his malfeasance had been revealed by the actions of others in his firm and because the Court in footnote 15 leaves open the possibility that true self-reporting of misconduct, without having been discovered by others already, possibly may serve as mitigation. In this vein, I believe that self-reporting should be encouraged by this Court and should be viewed as an important value to emulate. See, in this regard,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re CicardoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API