Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Palmer

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 30, 2010No. Misc. Docket AG No. 49, September Term, 2009Published

1Opinion of the Court

9 A.3d 37 (2010)

417 Md. 185

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

v.

Christopher Allen PALMER.

Misc. Docket AG No. 49, September Term, 2009.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

November 30, 2010.

James P. Botluk, Asst. Bar Counsel (Glenn M. Grossman, Bar Counsel, Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland), for petitioner.

Christopher Allen Palmer, Esquire, of Berlin, Maryland, for respondent.

Argued before BELL, C.J., HARRELL, BATTAGLIA, GREENE, MURPHY, ADKINS, and BARBERA, JJ.

HARRELL, J.

The Attorney Grievance Commission ("Petitioner"), acting through Bar Counsel, filed a Petition for Disciplinary or…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API