Legal Opinion

Davock v. Nealon

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reed, J.

This is an action of ejectment brought to recover the possession of a strip of land fronting one foot in width on *22Eerry street, and running, one foot in width, back from the street a distance of one hundred, feet. The facts proved at the trial were these:

Davock, the plaintiff, in July, 1873, bought lot No.'17 on a plot.

Nealon, the defendant, now owns the adjoining lot, No. 16.

When Davock bought, a house stood on his lot No. 17, one side of which house, with two fences, formed the practical line of division between the two lots.

One fence ran…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weber v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Smith v. ChapinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863
  3. Simpson & Isaacs v. DowningNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  4. Menkens v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Gregory v. ThorrezMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Kruvant v. 12-22 Woodland Ave. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  4. Freed v. Cloverlea Citizens Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Stump v. WhibcoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API