Legal Opinion
Freed v. Cloverlea Citizens Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 10, 1967No. [No. 196, September Term, 1966.]PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.
To prevail in this Court appellants (the Freeds) must establish their right to tack their adverse possession of 0.6 of an acre on the Rhode River (the triangular hatched area on Plat B) to the adverse possession of their predecessors in title. They lost in the court below because the trial judge thought they had shown “no color of title whatsoever.” In our recital of the facts we shall refer again to Plat B. Plat A, about which we shall also have more to say, is a part of the “Plat of Cloverlea.” Both are reproduced herein.
On 18 June 1926 Thomas Collison conveyed a 40 acre tract in Anne…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Belotti v. . BickhardtNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Oliver v. HookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
- Hanlon v. Ten HoveMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Wishart v. McKnightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- East Washington Railway Co. v. BrookeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Chesapeake Homes, Inc. v. McGrathCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Kirby v. HookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Mauck v. WALTER BAILEY, ADMINISTRATOR OF ESTATE OF LESTERCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Rosencrantz v. Shields, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Costello v. StaubitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.