Legal Opinion
Grauer v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenman, J.
This is a motion by the plaintiff for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, based upon the complaint, answer and reply.
The action is by the plaintiff to recover a judgment declaring two policies of life insurance issued by the defendant to him to be in full force and effect and to be valid and binding contracts. The complaint consists of two causes of action, each relating to one of the policies. The first cause of action involves a policy in the amount of $15,000 and the second in the amount of $10,000.
The first cause of action in substance alleges…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Steinberg v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Stroehmann v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Apter v. Home Life Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- People ex rel. Rice v. GravesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- People Ex Rel. Rice v. GravesNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Trousdell v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Blair v. New York Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. De Wald Radio Mfg. Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948
- Berkshire Life Insurance v. WeinigNew York Supreme Court · 1942
- In re the Accounting of SchrauthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.