Legal Opinion

United States v. McCall

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided June 24, 1988No. ACMR 8700458PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

KANE, Judge:

Appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members. Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted of two specifications of distribution of heroin, a violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a (Supp. I 1983). He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for one year, total forfeitures, and reduction to the grade of Private E-l. The convening authority approved the sentence.

The appellant contends that his court-martial lacked jurisdiction to try him because the panel was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. RyanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  2. United States v. MarshUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. CaldwellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. YatesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  5. United States v. TrislerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. HilowU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  2. United States v. PedenArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API