Legal Opinion

People v. Bennett

California Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1896No. Crim. No. 82PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County granting a new trial. F. B. Ogden, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

The defendant was charged, by information, with the crime of assault with intent to commit murder, and, on being arraigned, pleaded not guilty to the charge. He was tried and found guilty of assault with a deadly weapon. Thereupon, he gave notice of a motion for a new trial, which motion was subsequently heard and granted upon the ground that the verdict was not supported by the evidence. Thereafter, without being called upon or offering to enter any new plea to the information, he was again tried in the same court and before the, same judge, and found “guilty as charged.” In due time he…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. Lee Yune ChongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Commonwealth v. OldsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1824
  3. People v. OlwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Pitner v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Rickles v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. People v. McFarlaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. People v. NewellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Brady v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  4. People v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. In Re Application of HarronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API