Legal Opinion

Pitner v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1876PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Houston. Tried below before the Hon. R. S. Walker.

1Opinion of the Court

Roberts, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the District Court in the case of habeas corpus, wherein it was determined by the court that this was not the proper remedy to try the issue of autrefois acquit. In this the court did not err. The appropriate remedy, if the appellant is entitled to any, is by a special plea entered in the court in which the indictment is pending, under *579which the appellant is imprisoned. (Paschal’s Dig., art. 2951.) The indictment for assault with intent to murder is still standing in full force against him in a court of competent jurisdiction, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Perry v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Dickinson v. PurvisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1822

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MitchumCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Ex parte TiceOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  3. People v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Hovey v. SheffnerWyoming Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Ex Parte H.J. SpanellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API