Legal Opinion
United States v. Terrance Huell Lindsey
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 31, 2009No. 08-14916UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
Terrance Huell Lindsey appeals his sentences for armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a), (d), and use of a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A). Lindsey contends that after he pleaded guilty, the district court should have issued a sua sponte order for a competency hearing or a hearing to determine whether he should be sentenced to a mental health facility. 1
A district court is required to order a hearing sua sponte if it has reasonable cause to believe that a criminal defendant is mentally incompetent:
At any time after the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Cooper v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Cheryl Cohen, on Behalf of Herself and Others Similarly Situated v. Office Depot, Inc., a Florida CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. KenneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Brown v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
- Turner v. McCullough-Hyde Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- United States v. Dean LawtherCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Kenneth R. Jackson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021