Legal Opinion

Fisher v. California Insurance Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1964PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an action by plaintiff insured against defendant insurer to recover $1,157.25 under an insurance contract covering plaintiff’s automobile for damage caused by collision or upset. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant. The case was heard by the court without a jury.

The damage occurred when a heavy wind caused a tree to fall upon plaintiff’s parked car. The principal question on appeal is whether the occurrence was a “collision” within the meaning of the policy. The face of the policy contained the following item:

It is apparent from the above item that plaintiff is not covered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Saul v. Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Ness v. National Indemnity Company of NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1965
  4. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Central Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1964
  5. Larsen Oil Co. v. Federated Service InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API