Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Nelson v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 27, 1911PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1ConcurrenceClark, C. J.

This is an action to recover benefits, which the plaintiff alleges he is entitled to under the rules and regulations of the relief department of the defendant.

The plaintiff, an employee of defendant, became a member of the relief department on 28 June, 1902, and paid his dues, amounting to $6.15, up to 6 September, 1902, when he was accidentally injured.

After his injury he was paid, as benefits on account of his disability to work, $1 per day for twelve months, and thereafter 50 cents per day up to 15 May, 1905, making a total of $673.50.

On or about the last day, the superintendent of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Holmes v. RichetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Anacosta Tribe, No. 12 v. MurbachCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
  3. Osceola Tribe, No. 11 v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
  4. Hood v. HartshornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  5. Van Poucke v. Netherland St. Vincent De Paul SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Livingston v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  2. Skinner v. Gaither Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Andrews v. . JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. In Re the Administration of the Estate of ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Cordell v. . Brotherhood, Locomotive FiremenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API