Legal Opinion

In Re the Administration of the Estate of Reynolds

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1942PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

Tbe matter in controversy between tbe claimant and tbe administrator of tbe estate of Z. Smith Reynolds was tbe justness of her claim for tbe return of money borrowed from her by tbe intestate, evidenced by a note. At tbe time of tbe loan tbe intestate was under tbe age of twenty-one years, and died before attaining bis majority. Tbe amount of tbe loan was retained and not returned by tbe intestate or by bis administrator. For tbe determination of this controversy tbe parties agreed in writing to resort to tbe method prescribed by C. S., 99. Tbe decision thus reached and duly reported was in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Henry v. . HilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. Keener v. . GoodsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. District of Columbia v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Clark Millinery Co. v. National Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Junta de Relaciones del Trabajo v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1949
  2. University of Alaska v. Modern Construction, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. United Electrical Radio & MacHine Workers of America Local 235 v. Union Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  4. State Ex Rel. Rodgers v. ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. McAlpine v. PriddleAlaska Supreme Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API