Everett v. Emmons Coal Mining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtDenison, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The first controversy between the parties at the trial was as to whether acceptance 1713 was binding upon the vendee in all its terms, and thus became, with order 5562, the contract between the parties, or whether the contract was composed of the telegrams and order 5562. The Court left this to the jury, and since the excusatory clauses upon which the vendor relied as reasons for nondelivery were contained solely in acceptance 1713, and since the jury gave a verdict for practically the full amount claimed by the vendee, the verdict really may have been…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Warren v. StoddartSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Lawrence v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
- Campfield v. SauerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- Hull Coal & Coke Co. v. Empire Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1902
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. Peninsular Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chicago Ry. Equipment Co. v. Superior Charcoal Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926