Legal Opinion
In re the Complaint of Poling Transportation Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 8, 1991No. 87 Civ. 8505PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The Long Island Railroad (“LIRR”) and the Metropolitan Transit Authority (“MTA”), claimants in this action for exoneration or limitation of liability, have *858moved for summary judgment dismissing all claims, cross-claims and counterclaims against them arising out of an explosion and fire at the Ditmas Oil Associates Terminal in Long Island City (the “Terminal”). For the following reasons, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
THE PARTIES
LIRR and MTA are public benefits corporations organized and existing under the laws of New York. LIRR is a subsidiary of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Gregory Branum v. Clifford Clark, David Hanson, Paul Szarmach, George Stein, and Ross GeogheganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bliss v. Rochester City School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2002
- In Re Poling Transportation Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Morrisanderson, Ltd. v. Wenger Feed Mills, Inc. (In re ETFF Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- In Re the Complaint of Poling Transportation Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991