Legal Opinion

Verdugo-Gonzalez v. Holder

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 14, 2009No. 06-73733PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFTON, Circuit Judge:

Leonardo Verdugo-Gonzalez petitions for review of an order that he be removed from the United States to Mexico. He was held ineligible for cancellation of removal because he had previously been convicted of an aggravated felony. He argues that his felony conviction for receipt of stolen property under section 496(a) of the California Penal Code did not constitute an aggravated felony, but we conclude that a conviction under that statute categorically qualifies as an aggravated felony for these purposes. We thus deny the petition for review.

I. Background

Verdugo-Gonzalez…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. VidalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Maria Huerta-Guevara v. John D. Ashcroft, U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Patrick InnieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. Edwin FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Velasquez-BosqueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. Martinez-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Alvarez-Reynaga v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. Josue Martinez-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API