Legal Opinion
State v. Stump
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 7, 1994No. 12490-8-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.
— Curtis Guy Stump appeals his conviction of first degree perjury (RCW 9A.72.020). He contends the court erred both in finding he knew the statement to be false and in finding the statement was material.
On October 17 and 18, 1991, Mr. Stump was tried on charges he had burglarized the apartment of a prior girlfriend, Jill Phillips. The perjury charge against Mr. Stump arose from statements he made during that trial. The outcome of the burglary trial depended on the credibility of Mr. Stump’s version of events or Ms. Phillips’. Ms. Phillips admitted she used drugs. On direct examination, Mr.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. George W. Brumley, Sr., Robert W. Harrison, and William T. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- State v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- United States v. Terrance Alan EddyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- State v. WallisWashington Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re DornayWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Rantala v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009
- State v. SinghCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DornayWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Karen Koehler And Edward Moore, Apps. v. The City Of Seattle, Res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.