Legal Opinion
In Re Dornay
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 2007No. 200,315-0, 200,320-6PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
161 P.3d 333 (2007)
In the Matter of the DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING AGAINST Margita A. DORNAY, Attorney at Law.
Nos. 200,315-0, 200,320-6.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
June 21, 2007.
Robert Franklin Noe, Robert F. Noe PLLC, Yakima, WA, for Petitioner.
Kevin M. Bank, Washington State Bar Association, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
C. JOHNSON, J.
¶ 1 In this case, we consider whether an attorney who admittedly gave false testimony in a court proceeding should be suspended or disbarred. Disbarment is the American Bar Association's (ABA) presumptive sanction for attorneys who give false testimony in…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- In Re HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against WhittWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Disc. Proceeding Against PreszlerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against PreszlerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against TrejoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against TrejoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. HarvillWashington Supreme Court · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.