Frank Hair v. United States of America, John I. Burroughs v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
*895BAZELON, Circuit Judge.
Our appellants, Hair and Burroughs, were charged and convicted of housebreaking1 and robbery,2 and Burroughs was also charged and convicted of rape.3 Their principal contention on these appeals is that the District Court erred in refusing to exclude certain evidence obtained by officers of the Metropolitan Police.
The police officers testified as follows: On January 4, 1960, they were called to investigate a report of a housebreaking, robbery and rape. The victim told them that three young men, each masked and armed, had entered her house, stolen a large amount of cash…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Union Asphalt & Roadoils, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1968
- Everhart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Harry Carl Schoeneman v. United States of America, Garlan Euel Markham, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Robert Graham, United States of America v. Grady Lee TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Patrick C. Remigio, A/K/A Joe CuervoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.